#1)
Through the logical and seemingly predictable style of journalism anyone who reads this article would be hard pressed to argue against it. This is a positive way for anyone to make an argument, but could possibly be a product of the sporting world. The essay makes statements, and then backs them with undisputable statistics from the game, which he draws no further arguments from. This is a good tactic because he is not telling you what to think, he is simply pointing you in his direction of thought. The use of quotes throughout the article shows the reader that the author has been close enough to these individuals to get direct commentary from them; this is a huge credit to the author’s Ethos. The journalist cannot be questioned because he has direct commentary to support his main ideas.
#2)
He supports his ideas with backing from game stats and from quotes made by the players the day of the event. One issue to remember is that the paper, being so negative, shows that there is always some chance emotion is getting in the way of the whole story. This is important to remember when the author is a local writer.
#3)
The author uses the same tactics as the first two sources. Interesting to note that they all have access to the same statistics and quotes, but each took the facts and came up with differing opinions.
Each of these try to give a point of view, but at the same time they convince the reader through the ethos and logos that comes from the direct access these authors have to statistics.
Supper Claim:
***Argument in American sports is based on factual evidence such as statistics or actual events that can be reviewed. Although contradicting conclusions can be drawn from the same group of data, both claims are valid if they have evidential backing. These are direct examples of how differing points of view can shape an argument. It is important to note that some authors will skew their claims by intentionally omitting relevant information, especially if these facts oppose their argument. In the same way, the author’s location and local ties to an event can sway the position the writer takes. In an event where statistics and quotations are readily available, the arguments can seamlessly be made with supportive backing. But this may not always be the same in a world filled with less documented actions and not so many solid details. While these articles are a microcosmic example of one type of argument in America, it certainly is not a representative sample.
***Argument in American sports is based on factual evidence such as statistics or actual events that can be reviewed. Although contradicting conclusions can be drawn from the same group of data, both claims are valid if they have evidential backing. These are direct examples of how differing points of view can shape an argument. It is important to note that some authors will skew their claims by intentionally omitting relevant information, especially if these facts oppose their argument. In the same way, the author’s location and local ties to an event can sway the position the writer takes. In an event where statistics and quotations are readily available, the arguments can seamlessly be made with supportive backing. But this may not always be the same in a world filled with less documented actions and not so many solid details. While these articles are a microcosmic example of one type of argument in America, it certainly is not a representative sample.
*Arguments are seen as good when they are well established and well supported. But this may not be the only things involved in the decision of which argument will make an impact. One thing to keep in mind is where the writer is from and what perspective he is giving: is he giving a national or local opinion? And does it match with the popular opinion or challenge the majority of people’s ideas?
****This claim should:
1) Detail idea ^
2) give a road map of the organization of the essay (National level-ESPN#1-the norm of the opinion- negative, Local Level #2- negative, Local Level- #3 contrasting idea.
3) A transition into the second paragraph
No comments:
Post a Comment